国务院关于扩大沿海经济开放区范围的通知(附英文)
国务院
国务院关于扩大沿海经济开放区范围的通知(附英文)
国务院
为了贯彻实施沿海地区经济发展战略，充分发挥沿海地区的优势，积极发展外向型经济，促进我国的社会主义现代化建设，国务院决定适当扩大沿海经济开放区，现将扩大的范围通知如下：
天津市：
静海、宁河、宝坻、武清、蓟县。
河北省：
唐山市及所辖的丰南、滦南、乐亭、唐海、滦县；
沧州市及所辖的沧县、青县；
黄骅县、海兴县；
秦皇岛市所辖的昌黎、抚宁、卢龙县。
辽宁省：
丹东市及所辖的东沟、凤城县；
营口市及所辖的营口、盖县；
盘锦市及所辖的盘山、大洼县；
锦州市及所辖的锦西、兴城市、锦县、绥中县；
鞍山市及所辖的海城市；
辽阳市及所辖的辽阳、灯塔县；
大连市所辖的瓦房店市、新金、庄河县及由金县改成的金州区；
沈阳市。
江苏省：
南京市及所辖的江宁、六合、江浦县；
镇江市及所辖的丹徒、丹阳、扬中，句容县；
扬州市及所辖的泰州、仪征市、邗江、江都、靖江、泰兴、泰县；
盐城市及所辖的射阳、东台、大丰、响水、滨海县；
南通市所辖的南通、海门、启东、如东、如皋、海安县；
连云港市所辖的赣榆、东海、灌云县。
浙江省：
杭州市及所辖的萧山市、余杭、富阳、桐庐、临安县；
绍兴市及所辖的绍兴、上虞、嵊县；
嘉兴市所辖的平湖、海盐县；
湖州市所辖的长兴县；
宁波市所辖的余姚市、慈溪、奉化、宁海、象山、鄞县；
温州市所辖的欧海、乐清、瑞安、平阳、苍南、永嘉县；
椒江市、临海市、黄岩县。
福建省：
宁德、霞浦县。
山东省：
威海市所辖的荣城、文登、乳山县；
潍坊市及所辖的诸城、青州市、昌邑、昌乐、高密、五莲、寿光、安丘县；
淄博市及所辖的桓台县；
青岛市所辖的胶州市、平度、崂山、即墨、胶南、莱西县；
烟台市所辖的龙口、莱阳市、牟平、蓬莱、招远、海阳、栖霞；
莱州市；
日照市。
广西壮族自治区：
梧州市及所辖的苍梧县；
北海市所辖的合浦县；
玉林市、钦州市、防城县。
《中共中央、国务院关于批转＜长江、珠江三角洲和闽南厦
漳泉三角地区座谈会纪要＞的通知》（中发〔1985〕3号中规定
的各项政策，适用于上述地区。
CIRCULAR OF THE STATE COUNCIL CONCERNING THE EXPANSION OF THESCOPE OF THE COASTAL ECONOMIC OPEN ZONES
Important Notice: (注意事项)
英文本源自中华人民共和国务院法制局编译, 中国法制出版社出版的《中华人民
共和国涉外法规汇编》(1991年7月版).
当发生歧意时, 应以法律法规颁布单位发布的中文原文为准.
This English document is coming from "LAWS AND REGULATIONS OF THE
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA GOVERNING FOREIGN-RELATED MATTERS" (1991.7)
which is compiled by the Brueau of Legislative Affairs of the State
Council of the People's Republic of China, and is published by the China
Legal System Publishing House.
In case of discrepancy, the original version in Chinese shall prevail.
Whole Document (法规全文)
CIRCULAR OF THE STATE COUNCIL CONCERNING THE EXPANSION OF THE
SCOPE OF THE COASTAL ECONOMIC OPEN ZONES
(March 18, 1988)
With a view to implementing the strategy for the economic development of
the coastal areas, to bringing into full play the advantages of the
coastal areas, to actively promoting an export-oriented economy, and to
boosting the modernization drive in building socialism in China, the State
Council has therefore decided to expand appropriately the coastal economic
open zones. The following is now issued concerning the expansion:
The Municipality of Tianjin:
Jinghai, Ninghe, Baodi, Wuqing and Jixian County.
Hebei Province:
The Municipality of Tangshan, and Fengnan, Luannan, Leting, Tanghai and
Luanxian County under its jurisdiction;
The Municipality of Cangzhou, and Cangxian County, Qingxian County under
its jurisdiction;
Huanghua County, Haixing County;
Changli, Funing, Lulong County under the jurisdiction of the Municipality
of Qinhuangdao.
Liaoning Province:
The Municipality of Dandong, and the counties of Donggou, Fengcheng under
its jurisdiction;
The Municipality of Yingkou, and the counties of Yingkou, Gaixian under
its jurisdiction;
The Municipality of Panjin, and the counties of Panshan, Dawa under its
jurisdiction; The Municipality of Jinzhou, and Jinxi City, Xingcheng City,
Jinxian County, Suizhong County under its jurisdiction;
The Municipality of Anshan, and Haicheng City under its jurisdiction;
The Municipality of Liaoyang, and the counties of Liaoyang, Dengta under
its jurisdiction;
Wafangdian City, the counties of Xinjin and Zhuanghe, and also Jinzhou
District (originally known as Jinxian County) under the jurisdiction of
the Municipality of Dalian;
The Municipality of Shenyang.
Jiangsu Province:
The Municipality of Nanjing, and the counties of Jiangning, Liuhe and
Jiangpu under its jurisdiction;
The Municipality of Zhenjiang, and the counties of Dantu, Danyang,
Yangzhong and Jurong under its jurisdiction;
The Municipality of Yangzhou, and Taizhou City, Yizheng City, and the
counties of Hanjiang, Jiangdu, Jingjiang, Taixing and Taixian under its
jurisdiction; The Municipality of Yancheng, and the counties of Sheyang,
Dongtai, Dafeng, Xiangshui and Binhai under its jurisdiction;
The counties of Nantong, Haimen, Qidong, Rudong, Rugao and Hai'an under
the jurisdiction of the Municipality of Nantong;
The counties of Ganyu, Donghai and Guanyun under the jurisdiction of the
Municipality of Lianyungang.
Zhejiang Province:
The Municipality of Hangzhou, and Xiaoshan City, and the counties of
Yuhang, Fuyang, Tonglu and Lin'an under its jurisdiction;
The Municipality of Shaoxing, and the counties of Shaoxing, Shangyu and
Shengxian under its jurisdiction;
The counties of Pinghu and Haiyan under the jurisdiction of the
Municipality of Jiaxing; Changxing County under the jurisdiction of the
Municipality of Huzhou; Yuyao City, and the counties of Cixi, Fenghua,
Ninghai, Xiangshan and Yinxian under the jurisdiction of the Municipality
of Ningbo;
The counties of Ouhai, Yueqing, Rui'an, Pingyang, Cangnan and Yongjia
under the jurisdiction of the Municipality of Wenzhou;
The Municipalities of Jiaojiang and Linhai, and Huangyan County.
Fujian Province:
The counties of Ningde and Xiapu.
Shandong Province [*1]:
The counties of Rongcheng, Wendeng and Rushan under the jurisdiction of
the Municipality of Weihai;
The Municipality of Weifang and the municipalities of Zhucheng and
Qingzhou, and the counties of Changyi, Changle, Gaomi, Wulian, Shouguang
and Anqiu under its jurisdiction; The Municipality of Zibo, and Huantai
County under its jurisdiction;
Jiaozhou City, and the counties of Pingdu, Laoshan, Jimo, Jiaonan and
Laixi under the jurisdiction of the Municipality of Qingdao;
Longkou City, Laiyang City, and the counties of Mouping, Penglai,
Zhaoyuan, Haiyang and Qixia under the jurisdiction of the Municipality of
Yantai;
The Municipality of Laizhou;
The Municipality of Rizhao.
The Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region:
The Municipality of Wuzhou, and Cangwu County under its jurisdiction; Hepu
County under the jurisdiction of the Municipality of Beihai;
The Municipalities of Yulin, Qinzhou and Fangcheng County.
Note:
[*1] The State Council approved on February 19, 1990 that the Municipality
of Jinan is included in the Coastal Economic Open Zones. - The Editor
1988年3月18日
也谈北京宋庄农民与画家间的官司
魏海渊
牵动国内许多人神经的、北京通州区画家村农民与画家间的卖房官司，第一起案件的二审已经完结，北京市二中院的判决内容是：确认原告马海涛与被告李玉兰于二00二年七月一日所签之《买卖房协议书》无效，判令李玉兰须于本判决生效之日起九十日内，将位于北京市通州区辛店村的北房三间、西厢房六间及院落腾退给马海涛，马海涛给付李玉兰补偿款九万三千八百零八元。同时判决书认定：考虑到出卖人在出卖时即明知其所出卖的房屋及宅基地属禁止流转范围，出卖多年后又以违法出售房屋为由主张合同无效，故出卖人应对合同无效承担主要责任。对于买受人信赖利益损失的赔偿，应当全面考虑出卖人因土地升值或拆迁、补偿所获利益，以及买受人因房屋现值和原买卖价格的差异造成损失两方面因素予以确定。但鉴于李玉兰在原审法院审理期间未就其损失提出明确的反诉主张，在二审程序中，不宜就损失赔偿问题一并处理，李玉兰可就赔偿问题另行主张。
在我看来，北京市二中院的判决虽有所突破，一定程度上减低了意图通过毁约获取利益者的预期，但仍留有遗憾。作为具有标杆意义的案件，上述判决尚没有起到定纷止争的作用，没有让数百位已完全定居的画家们定下心来，也没让成千上万有类似情况的，在农村买了住房者的神经松弛下来，因为在房价飞涨的今天，那些认为卖了低价的村民随时可能会以买卖农村房屋无效为名，要求早已定居的买房人腾房，给社会带来大的不安定因素。
虽然，一般来说，合同无效的法律后果是，各自返还因该合同取得的财产，并按照过错分担损失，正如北京市二中院终审判决所确定的那样。然而，审理本案的法官，似乎没有注意到这种特殊的合同被认定为无效的法律后果，居于特别法地位的《中华人民共和国土地管理法》却另有规定，该法第62条第4款规定：“农村村民出卖、出租住房后，再申请宅基地的，不予批准。”，这一法律条文本非一种禁止性规范，它既认可村民的住房被出售、出租之后的状态，同时也指出了出售、出租所带来的后果。这里，立法者显然是考虑到了我国农村的一些实际情况。在农村，人们几乎用绝大部分的积蓄盖了房子，房屋面积有余而家庭抵御风险能力不足，如果遇到需大笔开销的紧急状况，最主要的资产—房子却不能出售或者以其他方式变现，势必会使他们陷入困境。逢此情形，对于他们而言，能够通过处理部分或者全部房屋筹到一大笔钱才是最现实的。另外，由于各地房屋租赁市场的兴起，处理住房之后，并不会导致他们流离失所。
所以，我认为北京市二中院还可以有更好地判决：即，一、原被告之间的《买卖房协议书》无效；二、但鉴于该合同已经履行近六年，被告已对房屋进行了较大幅度的改扩建，且土地和住房价格已经发生了很大的变化，现要求被告李玉兰腾出住房，既不符合法律规定，也有违公平原则和诚信原则，原告的诉讼请求没有法律依据，应当予以驳回。如果真能这样，将不失为是真正定纷止争的智慧判决。当然如果双方能够在对相关补偿达成一致的情况下，自行对腾房问题做出处理，则又另当别论。
